The governance grade, explained.
AIRGOV publishes its methodology in full. The grade reflects documentation completeness and currency, verified where possible. It is not an opinion on management, product, or financials.
01 · Score composition
The overall score is a weighted sum, computed against your tier's required checklist:
- Completeness — accepted items divided by required items at your tier.
- Currency — share of accepted items that are not expired or expiring within 30 days.
- Verification depth — weighted: L1 = 0.4, L2 = 0.7, L3 = 1.0.
02 · Grade bands
D floor: any missing, expired, or rejected critical item forces D regardless of score. Critical items include incorporation documents, mandatory licenses, and current annual financials.
03 · Verification levels
Default. Passed automated document classification, identifier format checks (SK Kemenkumham, NIB, NPWP), internal-consistency and file-metadata screens. Not a guarantee of authenticity.
Confirmed against official registries (AHU/Kemenkumham, OSS, DJP) via integration or manual lookup. On the v1.1 roadmap.
Countersigned by a recognized auditor, notary, or law firm through the platform. Required for top grades at higher tiers on critical documents.
04 · Recomputation & appeals
- Scores recompute on every document event (upload, acceptance, expiry).
- Upgrades take effect immediately.
- Downgrades take effect after a 14-day grace notice.
- Disputes go through a defined appeal flow with human review.
05 · What is never public
- The documents themselves.
- Specific financial figures.
- The specific list of missing items.
Publication is all-or-nothing. Companies may delist entirely, but cannot pay to hide a bad grade while remaining listed. Rating integrity requires it.